| 试论春秋公羊学派对历史文本的认识 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张振. 试论春秋公羊学派对历史文本的认识[J]. 山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 2009, 54(3): 60-63 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张振 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 首都师范大学文学院,北京,100089 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 春秋公羊学派在诠释历史文本《春秋》的基础上构建起了一个思辨的历史哲学体系。对于经典文本《春秋》，他们一方面十分重视，认为《春秋》是圣人所作，“《春秋》慎辞”；另一方面，出于构建理论体系的需要，他们又努力摆脱历史文本的限制，提出“实与而文不与”、“见其指者，不任其辞”、“《春秋》无达辞”等诠释命题，试图超越历史文本，建构历史哲学。
|
| 关 键 词： | 《春秋》 公学学 历史哲学 董仲舒 |
On the Understanding of the Text on History of the Spring and Autumn Annals' GongYang School |
| |
| Zhang Zhen. On the Understanding of the Text on History of the Spring and Autumn Annals' GongYang School[J]. Journal of Shandong Teachers' University(Social Science Edition), 2009, 54(3): 60-63 |
| |
| Authors: | Zhang Zhen |
| |
| Affiliation: | School of Literature;Capital Normal University;Beijing 100089;China |
| |
| Abstract: | The Spring and Autumn Annals＇ Gong Yang School constructs historical philosophy system, at the basis of interpretation of the Spring and Autumn Annals. To the classic, they place great emphasis on it, because they think it is written by Confucius. On the other hand, they struggle to get rid of the limitation of historical texts, for the need of construction of system. They put forward some propositions to construct a historical philosophy, such as ＂Approve in fact but not in texts＂, ＂Got the meaning, and forgot the texts＂, ＂No perfect texts in the Spring and Autumn Annals＂. |
| |
| Keywords: | The Spring and Autumn Annals the Spring and Autumn Annals＂ GongYang Study historical philosophy Dong Zhongshu |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
