从痴迷到迷惘:梁启超与近代新学的历史命运

梁启超将近代新学与西学剥离,并非仅仅是思想认识的逻辑结论,而是时代性学术朝向发展的历史必然。他洞微察远的卓见予我们以更多的理性启示:首先,近代新学是清代学术内在动因发展的必然结果。其次,西学乃近代新学构成要素之一,但不是惟一要素。其三,康有为汇聚并整合了晚清学术文化的蜕变趋势,完成了由旧趋新的历史转折。然而,民国时期的梁启超对于"新学"却转向了批判检讨,这恰恰反证着近代新学的时代特性与历史定位绝难等同于西学。

Liang Qichao and the Modern New Learning

It was the academic development's inexorable trend for Liang Qichao to distinguish the New Learning and the Wastern Learning. We gain a bood deal of enlightment fjrom his foresight and sagacity: Firstly, the modern new learning stems from Qing scholarship; Secondly, the western learning is one part of the new learning but not th only one; Thirdly, it was Kang Yuewei who conformed to the scholarship's development trends during the late Qing period and accomplished the academic change from old to the new. However, Liang Qichao during the period of the Republic of China, began to criticize "the New learning". Which exactly disproves that the modern new learning is not equal to the western learning for its times background and historic position.