首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

民事诉讼中释明权制度的价值分析
引用本文:徐前权,李华成.民事诉讼中释明权制度的价值分析[J].长江大学学报(社会科学版),2005,28(3):34-37.
作者姓名:徐前权  李华成
作者单位:长江大学政法学院,湖北,荆州,434020
摘    要:德国民事诉讼法最早确立了释明权制度,这种制度被视为职权主义的固有内容。通过分析释明权制度与两种诉讼模式的关系,可以看出,释明权虽然脱胎于职权主义,如将其融合于当事人主义,将能够克服当事人主义所带来的弊端,故该项制度有其存在的必要,并能为我国民事诉讼制度改革提供借鉴。

关 键 词:释明权  民事诉讼模式  价值取向
文章编号:1673-1395(2005)03-0034-04
修稿时间:2004年12月31

Value Analysis of Right of Aufklaerung System in Civil Litigation Procedure
XU Qian-quan,LI Hua-cheng.Value Analysis of Right of Aufklaerung System in Civil Litigation Procedure[J].Journal of Yangtze University:Social Sciences,2005,28(3):34-37.
Authors:XU Qian-quan  LI Hua-cheng
Abstract:German Code & Code of Civil Procedure first set up the right of Aufklaerung,it is regarded as the basic concept of authorities of the courts.When the parties conduct the main role in the civil procedure in the court.Through analyzing the relationship between right of Aufklaerung system and two litigation procedures,it can be seen that although the right of Aufklaerung system comes from authorities of the courts,if it is used properly,it can avoid the disadvantages of the adversarial system. Therefore, the right of Aufklaerung system is necessary to be introduced to China and it will provide more help for the civil procedure reform in China.
Keywords:right of Aufklaerung system  civil procedure model  value orientation
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号