首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


POOLED SLICING METHODS VERSUS SLICING METHODS
Abstract:We consider the semiparametric regression model introduced by [1] Duan, N. and Li, K. C. 1991. Slicing regression: a link-free regression method. The Annals of Statistics, 19: 505530. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar]. The dependent variable y is linked to the index x′ β through an unknown link function. [1] Duan, N. and Li, K. C. 1991. Slicing regression: a link-free regression method. The Annals of Statistics, 19: 505530. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar] and [2] Li, K. C. 1991. Sliced inverse regression for dimension reduction, with discussions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 86: 316342. [Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar] present Slicing methods (the Sliced Inverse Regression methods SIR-I, SIR-II and SIRα) in order to estimate the direction of the unknown slope parameter β. These methods are computationally simple and fast but depend on the choice of an arbitrary slicing fixed by the user. When the sample size is small, the number and the position of slices have an influence on the estimated direction. In this paper, we suggest to use the corresponding Pooled Slicing methods: PSIR-I (proposed by [3] Aragon, Y. and Saracco, J. 1997. Sliced Inverse Regression (SIR): an appraisal of small sample alternatives to slicing. Computational Statistics, 12: 109130. [Web of Science ®] [Google Scholar]), PSIR-II and PSIRα. These methods combine the results from a number of slicings. We compare the sample behaviour of Slicing and Pooled Slicing methods on simulations. We also propose a practical choice of α in SIRα and PSIRα methods.
Keywords:Semiparametric Regression  Dimension Reduction  Sliced Inverse Regression
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号