首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

藏传因明充足理由之三项条件与形式逻辑假言判断三形式之比较
引用本文:达哇.藏传因明充足理由之三项条件与形式逻辑假言判断三形式之比较[J].青海民族学院学报(社会科学版),2005,31(2):15-21.
作者姓名:达哇
作者单位:中央民族大学 北京100081
摘    要:藏传因明的正确论证论式是一个具有充足理由(正因)的论式,要具有充足理由必须要具备充足理由的三项条件,而这三项条件就是三个判断。三项条件中的第二项和第三项条件具有形式逻辑的假言判断性质。本文通过对该两项条件的假言判断性质的分析,旨在说明藏传因明对假言判断范畴的研究。

关 键 词:充足理由  三项条件  假言判断  性质因  果性因  未现见因
文章编号:1000-5447(2005)02-0015-07
修稿时间:2004年3月4日

A Comparative Study On the Three Conditions of Abundant Reasons of the Heturidya in Tibetan Area and the Three Forms of Hypothetic Judgments of Formal Logic
DAwa.A Comparative Study On the Three Conditions of Abundant Reasons of the Heturidya in Tibetan Area and the Three Forms of Hypothetic Judgments of Formal Logic[J].Journal of Qinghal Nationalities Institute(Social Sciences),2005,31(2):15-21.
Authors:DAwa
Abstract:The pattern of correct demonstration of the Heturidya in Tibetan area is a pattern of being abundant reasons, being imbued with abundant reasons must possess three corditons of the abundant reasons ,this three conditions are precisely the theee judgments. The second and third condition in the three conditions have the character of hypothetis judgments of formal logic .In this paper ,the author analyzes the character of hypothetic judgments about the mentioned above ,its purpose lies in illustrating the Tibetan Heturidya to the study of hypothetic judgments field.
Keywords:the abundant reasons  three conditions  hypothetic judgment  character factor  factor caused effect  unknown factor  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号