首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Midwifery in Middle Eastern and North African countries: A scoping review
Institution:1. The University of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Drive, Sippy Downs, Queensland, 4556, Australia;2. Southern Cross University, Gold Coast Airport, Terminal Dr, Bilinga, Queensland, 4225, Australia;1. Department of Psychology, College of Healthcare Sciences, James Cook University, Australia, @BrianLaw_Psych;2. School of Human Sciences (Exercise and Sports Science), Faculty of Science, The University of Western, Australia;3. Division of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, The University of Western, Australia;4. Peel and Rockingham, Kwinana Mental Health Service, Western Australia, Australia;5. Ngala, Western Australia, Australia;6. Telethon Kids Institute, Western Australia, Australia;7. Cairnmillar Institute, Victoria, Australia;1. Centenary Hospital for Women and Children, and University of Canberra, Faculty of Health, 11 Kirinari St, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia;2. ACT Government Health Directorate and University of Canberra, Faculty of Health, 11 Kirinari St, Bruce, ACT 2617, Australia
Abstract:BackgroundWhile midwives are positioned as critical providers for improving sexual, reproductive, maternal and newborn health outcomes in the Middle East and North African (MENA) countries, the standards of midwifery have not been explored systematically in this region.AimThe purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of existing literature on midwifery practice, education, and regulation in MENA countries in the context of ICM standards.MethodsA search was conducted inclusive of English and Persian written studies published between 2000 and 2019 in CINAHL plus; Ovid MEDLINE; PubMed; Scopus; and grey literature. Title and abstract and full-text review were performed in Covidence, and data extraction and synthesis performed using NVivo 12.ResultsThe initial search identified 7,994 articles. Overall, 139 studies were included in the review. Although, the primary concept of most included studies was “midwifery practice”, “midwifery regulation” was addressed in limited way. Approximately 90% were from Middle Eastern countries. Forty-two per cent of studies used cross-sectional designs, and most originated from Iran, Jordan, and Palestine. Diversity was found in midwifery education, practice and regulation across the MENA countries. Midwives from different nations had uneven levels of proficiency, scope of practice, and education. Midwifery curricula were aligned with ICM competencies in some countries. Most countries had midwifery associations and were members of ICM. Some countries had regulations recognising midwifery as an autonomous profession.ConclusionMidwifery practice, education and regulation in MENA countries were not always comparable with ICM standards, although some progress was evident.
Keywords:Midwifery  Education  Practice  Regulation  Middle East  North Africa
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号