首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

反思行政诉讼中法官的调取证据权
引用本文:李运超,柳砚涛.反思行政诉讼中法官的调取证据权[J].徐州工程学院学报(社会科学版),2010,25(3):6-9.
作者姓名:李运超  柳砚涛
作者单位:山东大学法学院,山东,济南,250100
基金项目:山东省社会科学规划项目课题
摘    要:我国行政诉讼法赋予了人民法院依申请和依职权两种情形进行调查取证的权力以及对所取得证据进行认证的权力,这同时造成了人民法院的定位不明、权能混乱,甚至有违宪法实施、一般法理和诉讼价值的相关理念。但是面对超职权主义的审判模式对司法的深刻影响又不能简单地对其一废了之,那么在条件尚不成熟之时进行证据规则完善、取证认证相分离,选择司法改良、遵循和谐司法道路是解决此问题的阶段性建议。

关 键 词:调取证据权  质疑反思  审调分离

Reflections on the Court's authority to obtain evidence in Administrative proceedings
LI Yun-chao,LIU Yan-tao.Reflections on the Court's authority to obtain evidence in Administrative proceedings[J].Journal of xuzhou Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition),2010,25(3):6-9.
Authors:LI Yun-chao  LIU Yan-tao
Institution:(Law School,Shandong University,Jinan 250100,Shandong,China)
Abstract:According to China's Administrative Procedure Law,people's court has the authority,ex officio or upon applicants,to obtain and authenticate the evidence.However,it also leads to the disorders and unclear classifications of courts and even goes against the constitution implementation,general law or actionable value.As it cannot be abolished under the influence of the traditional super intervening trial model,improving the rules of evidence,separating mediation from trial and following the harmonious justice system are the good choices to resolve the problem when the condition is not mature yet.
Keywords:authority to obtain evidence  query and reflect  separation mediation from trial
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号