首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刑事审前法官制度的中国语境分析
引用本文:张月满,聂海波.刑事审前法官制度的中国语境分析[J].山东科技大学学报(社会科学版),2009,11(3):25-31.
作者姓名:张月满  聂海波
作者单位:1. 山东政法学院,刑事司法学院,山东,济南250014
2. 海南省高级人民法院,政策研究室,海南,海口570206
摘    要:刑事审前法官制度的缺位,不仅导致我国侦查程序中非法侦查行为屡禁不止,权利救济机制处于空白状态,侦查程序不具诉讼形态;也使得公诉权缺乏应有的控制,公诉方式改革未能达到预期的效果;还造成庭前程序中非法证据排除规则不能落实,证据展示程序难以运行以及庭审法官的预断不能排除。

关 键 词:刑事审前法官制度  权力制约  人权保障  司法审查制度

An analysis of the Criminal Pretrial System in Chinese Context
ZHANG Yue-man,NIE Hai-bo.An analysis of the Criminal Pretrial System in Chinese Context[J].Journal of Shandong University of Sciences & Technology(Social Science),2009,11(3):25-31.
Authors:ZHANG Yue-man  NIE Hai-bo
Institution:(Shandong Academy of Politics and Law , Ji'nan, Shandong 250014; High Court of Hainan Province , Haikou, Hainan 570206)
Abstract:The vacancy of the criminal pretrial system has produced multitude unfavorable influences on China's judicial procedure. Reports of illegal behaviors constantly flow in despite repeated efforts to ban such illegal practice, and right relief mechanism has so far remained vacant. Investigation is as much excluded from the litigation procedure as the power of public prosecution is free from restrains. The failures of public prosecution reform are more than that. While illegal evidences can not be removed as stipulated before court adjudication, evidence display procedure is difficult to carry out. The problem is even compounded as the judge's forejudge creeps in.
Keywords:the criminal pretrial system  power restriction  human right ensurance  judicial review system
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号