“儒林列传”与“汉学师承”——《汉学师承记》的修撰及汉宋之争

江藩撰写的《汉学师承记》历来被视为清代学术史的重要资料,但是在该书学术内涵的解读方面尚有待发之覆。此书的学术意义与作者的撰述动机密切相关。江藩撰写本书特别与阮元总辑《国史儒林传》一事有关,江氏的意图是要影响《国史儒林传》的编撰。由此江藩以正史的笔法和规模,在《汉学师承记》中构建了一个以“汉学”为正宗的清代儒学学术史,在此过程中他强化了汉宋门户之见,将主宋学者摒弃在外。正是因为其强烈的门户之见,《汉学师承记》才引起宋学者的激烈反对,但是因为具有正史的笔法和规模并得到阮元的支持,它得以对整个清代学术史的书写产生了巨大影响。

Why Did JINAG Fan Compile Records of Han-Learning Masters and Its Role in Scholars Controvesies Between Han-Learning and Song-Learning

JIANG Fan's Records of Han-learning Masters of the Qing Dynasty is considered an important material of intellectual history and its academic significance needs further studies.Jiang's motive to compose this book,which is crucial to understand the the academic meaning of the work,is still questionable.This paper tries to reveal that JIANG's composition of Records of the Han-learning Masters of the Qing Dynasty was relevant to RUAN Yuan's compilation of Draft Biographies of Confucians in the Qing History and JIANG wanted to exert influence upon Yuan's task.So in Records of Han-learning Masters of the Qing Dynasty JIANG Fan constructed an outline of intellectual history of the Qing Dynasty which took Han-learning as authentic scholarship according to the style and scope of official history,during the composition he enhanced the contest between the Han-learning and Song-learning scholars.