Volunteering in a School Kitchen Garden Program: Cooking Up Confidence,Capabilities, and Connections! |
| |
Authors: | Mardie Townsend Lisa Gibbs Susie Macfarlane Karen Block Petra Staiger Lisa Gold Britt Johnson Caroline Long |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Faculty of Health, School of Health and Social Development, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia 2. Jack Brockhoff Child Health & Wellbeing Program, The McCaughey Centre, School of Population Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3053, Australia 3. Faculty of Health, School of Psychology, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia 4. Faculty of Health, Deakin Health Economics, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, VIC, 3125, Australia
|
| |
Abstract: | This paper reports on the evaluation of a kitchen garden program in primary schools in Victoria, Australia. It focuses on the motivations, impacts, and issues associated with volunteering in the program. The study revealed that volunteers are drawn from a range of sources, including: families of current and former students, former teachers, local residents, clients of aged care and/or disability services, other schools and communities, local universities, community organizations, the community services sector, and the corporate sector. Benefits to volunteers included: opportunities to use time productively, an increased sense of belonging, learning opportunities, and an increased sense of self-worth and enjoyment. For schools, volunteers enhanced engagement between the school and the local community, enabled them to engage more effectively with hard to reach groups, and increased student engagement. In addition, the involvement of volunteers improved the sustainability of the program, improved communication between teachers and families of students from minority ethnic groups, and gave students the chance to relate to new people, to learn from their experience and to have fun in working with the volunteers. Perhaps the most telling benefits to flow both to students and to volunteers were not the “three Rs—reading, w’riting and a’rithmetic” but the three Cs—confidence, capabilities, and connections. However, a clearly identified issue was the importance of matching volunteers’ motivations and needs with the roles they play to sustain current levels of volunteering and, therefore, the program itself. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|