四要件视域下正当防卫出罪论

正当防卫的解释问题，被我国犯罪构成体系重构论者视为传统犯罪构成体系的重大理论缺陷，也被作为批判传统犯罪构成体系的坚实阵地。在对正当防卫出罪机制的研究过程中，现有的主观说、实质说、违法阻却事由说要么过于片面，要么缺乏科学性、逻辑不周延。在四要件犯罪构成体系的视域下，结合正当防卫的实质予以剖析，可以发现正当防卫并不符合犯罪构成的任一方面，在传统四要件的理论框架中根本不需要在犯罪构成之外去解决正当防卫的出罪困境。

The Exoneration Theory of Justifiable Defense under the Perspective of Four Elements

The interpretation of justifiable defense is deemed as major theoretical defect of traditional crime constitution system by some re-constructionists of China’s crime constitution system,and also considered as the solid position to criticize the traditional crime constitution system.In the research of mechanism for exoneration of justifiable defense,the existing subjective theory,substantial theory and justifiable cause theory are either too one-sided or lack scientific logic.Analyzing the essence of justifiable defense under the perspective of the crime constitution system of four elements,it is found that the justifiable defense does not conform to any aspect of crime constitution.In the theoretical framework of four elements,it is unnecessary to resolve the exoneration predicament of justifiable defense outside the crime constitution.