| 《关于“定语+人称代词”结构的思考》商榷三题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 崔山佳. 《关于“定语+人称代词”结构的思考》商榷三题[J]. 宁波大学学报(人文科学版), 2012, 0(3): 29-33 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 崔山佳 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江财经学院人文学院,浙江杭州310018 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(10YJA740015) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刁晏斌对“定语+人称代词”的看法有一个深化过程,他后来支持汉语固有说,而魏志成是持“日化”说,汪化云、张凤琴、冯鸣持“综合说”.有些“定语+人称代词”的“定语”非单一的“体词性”或“谓词性”,而是综合性的.持“综合说”的学者有一共同处,即承认汉语有“定语+人称代词”现象,但数量很少,这不符合汉语事实,“五四”前的汉语中有大量的“定语+人称代词”现象,因此,“定语+人称代词”是汉语固有的语法现象
|
| 关 键 词： | 定语 人称代词 综合性定语 |
About the Structure Attributive+Personal Pronoun |
| |
| CUI Shan-jia. About the Structure Attributive+Personal Pronoun[J]. Journal of Ningbo University(Liberal Arts Edition), 2012, 0(3): 29-33 |
| |
| Authors: | CUI Shan-jia |
| |
| Affiliation: | CUI Shan-jia(College of Humanities,Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics,Hangzhou 310018,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | About the structure of attributive plus pronoun,scholars like Diao Yanbin,Wei Zhicheng,Wang Huayun,Zhang Fengqin and Feng Ming have divergent opinions.Those for the "synthetic theory" argue that though Chinese has such a structure the uses are very few in number.This article argues that this statement is not correct for there were a large number of uses of the attributive+personal pronoun structure in Chinese before the May 4th Movement.So the structure of attributive+personal pronoun is an inherent property of the Chinese language. |
| |
| Keywords: | attributive personal pronoun synthetic attributive |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
