首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

美国辩诉交易制度之理论探析--兼论辩诉交易制度与我国刑事司法
引用本文:朱玉玲,佀连涛. 美国辩诉交易制度之理论探析--兼论辩诉交易制度与我国刑事司法[J]. 山东农业大学学报(社会科学版), 2004, 6(1): 99-102
作者姓名:朱玉玲  佀连涛
作者单位:1. 山东科技大学文法学院,山东,泰安,271019
2. 山东科技大学工程学院,山东,泰安,271019
摘    要:公正与效益成为现代刑事诉讼程序所追求的两大价值目标。但是,公正与效益在法价值体系中往往是相互冲突的。简易程序的创立正是为了协调二者之间的矛盾,从而更好地利用有限的司法资源,追求刑事诉讼价值的最大化,以保障被告人诉讼权利的实现。于是有些法学家建议采用美国的辩诉交易制度来改进我国的刑事审判简易程序。在本文中作者结合美国辩诉交易制度形成的背景、原因和我国的具体法治情况来阐述我国刑诉简易程序不宜全盘采纳辩诉交易制度,并为我国刑事司法改革的发展提供参考。

关 键 词:简易程序  辩诉交易  公正  效益
文章编号:1008-8091(2004)01-0099-04
修稿时间:2003-05-23

The theoretical analysis of the system of plea bargaining of America——And discuss the system of plea bargaining and the criminal justice of China
ZHU Yu-ling,SI Lian-tao. The theoretical analysis of the system of plea bargaining of America——And discuss the system of plea bargaining and the criminal justice of China[J]. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University, 2004, 6(1): 99-102
Authors:ZHU Yu-ling  SI Lian-tao
Abstract:Justice and benefit have become two big aims of value that the modern criminal dispute procedure is pursuing. But justice and benefit usually conflict each other in the value system of law. The institution of facility procedure can just harmonize the contraventions of them,further use the limited resource of justice, pursue the biggest dispute value of crime, and guarantee the attainment of defendant. So some legists suggest we can adapt the system of plea bargaining of America to improve the facility procedure of criminal adjudgement of China .In this article, the writer links the background and reason of plea bargaining in America with the body monocracy in China to state that the facility procedure of criminal adjudgement in China can not totally adapt the system of plea bargaining of America, and provide a reference for the reform and development of crimal justice in China.
Keywords:facility procedure  plea-bargaining  justices  benefit  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号