“子敬箴”与伴宇右卫门书信的再发现——试论朱舜水与山鹿素行思想互动的可能性

朱舜水为山鹿素行所作的“子敬箴”不仅体现了箴言的规劝之意，还显示出二人在“性善”问题上的分歧。山鹿素行写给伴宇右卫门的书信也证实了二人间的思想分歧，甚至山鹿素行在信中将朱舜水斥之为“俗儒”。加之《答安东省庵书》和《与安东守约书》的参照比较，可以更加肯定地认识到二人思想互动可能性之渺茫。通过朱舜水与山鹿素行古学互动可能性的考察，可以清楚地发现江户时代日本儒学对明末中国儒学的冲击，明确儒学在东亚传播的普遍性及日本儒学的特殊性。

-

The Shikeishin written by Zhu Shunshui to YamagaSoko not only served as admonishment but also embodied the differences in their understanding of the idea of “the original goodness of human nature”. The letters written by YamagaSoko to TomoUemon are also proof of the intellectual difference between Zhu Shunshui and YamgaSoko. In the letters, YamagaSoko even denounced Zhu Shunshui as Zokujyu. After a comparative study of “Answering Seian Ando’s Letter” and “A Letter to Shuyaku Ando”, the possibility of the intellectual interaction between the two scholars is proved to be impossible. By examining the possibility of the intellectual interaction between Zhu Shunshui and YamagSoko, this research clarified the impact that the Confucian Study in the Edo Period of Japan had on Chinese Confucian Study in the Late Ming Dynasty and further illuminated the generality of the Confucianism spread in East Asia and the particularity of Japanese Confucianism.