地方司法解释性质文件的实效及法理研究——以医疗损害责任纠纷的文件为例

在法律留有较大解释空间的领域，地方法院常出台司法解释性质文件以统一法律适用。就实际效果而言，地方司法解释性质文件在各自管辖区内发挥了一定的统一裁判尺度的功能，但不同地方法院的文件却常做出不同的甚至相互冲突的规定，导致更大范围内的混乱。从法理视角看，地方司法解释性质文件面临着合法性危机，是对司法统一性的片面追求，并可能加剧司法的地方化与行政化倾向。重重困境之下，地方司法解释性质文件的改革势在必行。

The Effectiveness and Legal Reasonableness of the Local Documents of Judicial Interpretation Nature as Exemplified by the Document of Medical Damage Liability Dispute

In areas where the law has a large space for interpretation, local courts often formulate documents of judicial interpretation to unify the application of the law. As far as the actual effect is concerned, the local documents of judicial interpretation have played a certain role in the unity of the law of the respective jurisdictions. However, the documents of different local courts often make different or even conflicting regulations, resulting in a chaos across the country. From the perspective of jurisprudence, local documents of judicial interpretation face a crisis of legitimacy, and is a one-side pursuit of judicial unity. It may aggravate the localization and administrative tendency of the judiciary. Facing the dilemma, the reform of local documents of judicial interpretation is imperative