| 论刑事诉讼中的法庭质证 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 薛拴良,卢永红. 论刑事诉讼中的法庭质证[J]. 兰州大学学报(社会科学版), 1999, 0(2) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 薛拴良 卢永红 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 甘肃政法学院科教办公室(薛拴良)，甘肃政法学院法律系(卢永红) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 刑事庭审，本质上由举证、质证、认证构成，质证是中心环节。质证即控辩双方针对在案件中所提出的证据进行质疑、辩驳的诉讼活动。质证的内容是证据的许容性与证据能力。在司法实践中，质证困难之根源在于举证困难、无交叉询问规则、缺少庭前证据交换的制度、控辩双方无法均衡对抗等。为达到质证的实质目的，应采取的对策包括从立法上设立保障作证与强制作证之规则，设立交叉询问规则，建立“证据先悉”程序等
|
| 关 键 词： | 举证；质证；认证；取证；证据交换制度 |
On the Court Questioning in Criminal Lawsuit |
| |
| Xue Shuanliang Lu Yonghong. On the Court Questioning in Criminal Lawsuit[J]. Journal of Lanzhor University(Social Sciences), 1999, 0(2) |
| |
| Authors: | Xue Shuanliang Lu Yonghong |
| |
| Affiliation: | Xue Shuanliang 1 Lu Yonghong 2 |
| |
| Abstract: | Criminal trial is basically composed of proofs, questions and answers, and attestation. The center is questions and answers whose contents are the acceptability and power of proofs. In legal practice, the difficulty lies in the lack for rules regulating cross questioning, proof exchange before court and the failure of balance between both parties. Therefore, the present authors think it necessary to adopt certain measures, including legislation, to guarantee the practice of such rules and establish the procedure of warm-up familiarizations. |
| |
| Keywords: | proof questions and answers attestation evidence |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
