首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

“共同但有区别的责任”原则的制度性设计
引用本文:吕江.“共同但有区别的责任”原则的制度性设计[J].山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2011,34(5):117-121.
作者姓名:吕江
作者单位:山西大学法学院,山西太原,030006
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目:“哥本哈根气候变化谈判对构建中国能源安全法律制度的影响”(09YJC820068)
摘    要:随着联合国气候变化谈判进程的继续,国际法下的"共同但有区别的责任"原则已难以完全适应国际气候领域的诸多变化。因此,重构这一原则,无疑成为达成新的国际气候协议的关键。然而,目前国际社会提出的种种制度性设计均无法满足当前气候政治的现实要求,重构面临极大的困难性;但是毫无疑问,权力势必主导这一建构过程,国家也将在软硬法的相互博弈下做出选择。

关 键 词:“共同但有区别的责任”原则  气候变化  国际法  国际气候制度

Institutional Design of the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility
LV Jiang.Institutional Design of the Principle of Common but Differentiated Responsibility[J].Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition),2011,34(5):117-121.
Authors:LV Jiang
Institution:LV Jiang(School of Law,Shanxi University,Taiyuan 030006,China)
Abstract:With the ongoing process of international climate negotiations,the principle of common but differentiated responsibility is unable to fully adapt to the changing international realities.Therefore,it is a key for reaching a new international climate agreement to reconstruct the principle.In the process,power is bound to play a leading role,and game between countries will take place through the interaction of hard law and soft law.On such a basis,China should size up the situation and examine the institutiona...
Keywords:the principle of common but differentiated responsibility  climate change  international law  international climate institution  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号