| 文化决定论抑或法律能动性——文化立法的前提性论争 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 何锦前.文化决定论抑或法律能动性——文化立法的前提性论争[J].湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版),2013,16(6):42-46. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 何锦前 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 清华大学 法学院，北京 100084 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 文化与法律存在错综复杂的交互关系，文化是制度建构的约束性条件，法律也具有鲜明的能动性价值和本体论地位。当前的反文化立法主义者从文化决定论或文化宿命论中寻找其理论依据，重蹈了历史的覆辙而不自知。我们应以对法律与文化交互关系的充分理解为前提，摒弃机械主义的文化决定论，并注重预防立法者的过度自信和恣意妄为，扎实、稳妥而有效地推进文化领域的法治进程。
|
| 关 键 词： | 文化 法律 决定论 能动性 |
Cultural Determinism or Legal Activism: The Preliminary
Contestation of Cultural Legislation |
| |
| HE Jin qian.Cultural Determinism or Legal Activism: The Preliminary
Contestation of Cultural Legislation[J].journal of hunan university of science&technology,2013,16(6):42-46. |
| |
| Authors: | HE Jin qian |
| |
| Institution: | School of Law, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Culture and laws always interact with the complicated relationship. One of the constraint conditions for lawmaking is culture. At the same time, laws have distinct active function and ontological position. We should fully understand the interaction of culture and laws, discard the mechanical cultural determinism, and guard against the legislatorial overconfidence and arbitrary decision to promote the building of the cultural legal system. |
| |
| Keywords: | culture law determinism activism |
|
| 点击此处可从《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
