首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

中国行政审判体制改革研究:兼论我国行政法院体系构建的基础、依据及构想
引用本文:何海波. 行政诉讼法研究3.0[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2018, 31(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2018.0242
作者姓名:何海波
作者单位:1.清华大学 法学院, 北京 100084
摘    要:

随着《行政诉讼法》的修改,行政诉讼法研究进入了它的3.0时代。行政诉讼法研究面对不同层次的课题:来自行政诉讼实践的众多法律适用问题亟需解释和澄清,一些基本制度有待长期、深入的理论研究进一步完善,行政诉讼的实践图景有待实证研究予以揭示。行政诉讼法研究也应更加注重方法:案例研究、原理阐释和比较法研究应当更加专业,综合的、跨学科的理论研究大有可为,实证研究中的定量研究将成趋势。行政诉讼研究多元化的同时,也呼唤研究的规范化。



关 键 词:行政诉讼法学  法学研究  规范研究  立法研究  实证研究
收稿时间:2018-08-20

Citizens vs. mandarins
HE Haibo. Administrative Litigation Law Research 3.0 in China[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2018, 31(5): 1-8. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2018.0242
Authors:HE Haibo
Affiliation:1.School of Law, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Abstract:With the amendment of the Administrative Litigation Law (ALL) in 2014, research on the ALL has entered its 3.0 era. Scholars are facing subjects of different levels:Many issues arising from the amended law need to be interpreted and clarified; some fundamental institutions to be improved through long-term in-depth study; the dynamic pictures of legal practice to be described through empirical research. Scholars need more awareness on the research methodologies:Case study, principle elaborations and comparative law study, which are familiar to most legal scholars, should be more professional; comprehensive, cross-disciplinary study will be on rise; empirical study (especially quantative analysis based on the publicized judicial data) will be widely used.
Keywords:Administrative Litigation Law  legal scholarship  legal interpretation  legislative study  empirical study
点击此处可从《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号