首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

互联网金融的监管探析
引用本文:陈沛. 我国金融科技的监管困境与路径选择[J]. 电子科技大学学报社科版, 2018, 20(6): 57-64. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2018)-4002
作者姓名:陈沛
作者单位:1.华东政法大学 上海 200042
摘    要:近年来,随着大数据、云计算、人工智能、区块链等数字技术的发展,金融科技(Financial Technology,FinTech)成为了学术界和实务界广泛关注的焦点产业。金融科技的创新能够提高金融配置资源的效率,完善金融的风控体系,有助于巩固金融的稳定性和普惠性,但同时由于其打破了技术与金融的边界,不仅无法消除金融的固有风险,反而使得风险传播速度更快、传播方式更隐蔽,由此带来了监管的困局。目前,我国监管当局尚未摒弃传统的监管思维,存在着“放任自流”和“一刀切”的极端监管方式,为监管套利留下了空间。未来,应探索完善金融科技创新与监管的平衡机制,充分借鉴国外成熟经验创新监管方式,尤其运用监管科技推进创新与监管的不断融合。

关 键 词:金融科技创新  金融监管  金融风险  监管科技
收稿时间:2018-06-26

Regulatory Quandary and Its Solutions of FinTech in China
CHEN Pei. Regulatory Quandary and Its Solutions of FinTech in China[J]. Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(SOCIAL SCIENCES EDITION), 2018, 20(6): 57-64. DOI: 10.14071/j.1008-8105(2018)-4002
Authors:CHEN Pei
Affiliation:1.East China University of Political Science and Law Shanghai 200042 China
Abstract:With the development of big data, cloud computing, AI, block chain and other digital technologies, financial technology is being widely billed as one of the focus industries by the academics and practical realm in recent years. FinTech can improve the efficiency of financial resources’ allocation, enhance the system of risk control, and consolidate both the stability and inclusiveness of finance. Meanwhile, FinTech breaks the boundaries between technology and finance, which cannot eliminate the inherent risk of finance, and even makes financial risks much more infectious and concealed, thus bringing a regulatory dilemma. At present, Chinese supervisory authorities still keep the outdated supervisory thinking, usually in the extreme forms
Keywords:financial technology innovation  financial regulation  financial risk  regulatory technology
点击此处可从《电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号