社会行动的意义效应与东亚三国集体结构的锻铸--关于现时代中、日、韩关系的一种社会学理论构想

全球化的迅速发展对东亚地区产生了日益深刻的持续影响.一方面,为了成为全球化的适应者,东亚三国强化了国内的政策调整与制度改革,以提高对超国家的全球体系的应对能力.另一方面,在金融、贸易、生态环境等领域,东亚已形成了跨国性的区域合作.如何使国家在全球体系中获得安全,并进一步促进跨国性区域合作,以对国际关系机制形成广泛而积极的影响,是东亚国家所要面对的共同课题.从社会行动意义效应的理论角度看,社会行动与社会结构是同一社会过程的两个观察侧面,它们之间是相互胶着和彼此建塑的关系.现代社会主体是"意义主体",社会行动则是"意义行动".在社会主体行动的意义效应过程中,促成了意义化的行动关联模式体系,亦即行动的结构.结构中的"异者"与"异见"可通过结构意义资源的不断生成而建立起某种共同的悟知和一致性的意愿.如果结构内部的意义资源能够形成一轮又一轮的递进状态,将为持久、稳定、富于生机的合作体系奠定坚实的基础.因此,"东亚三国集体结构"可以说应当是作为行动主体的中、日、韩三国间的行动意义效应过程所锻铸或建塑的一种事实过程.随着中、日、韩三国共有悟知的发展,去中心化过程、主体平等必将进一步推进,从而使相互间通过让与或坚持、接受或拒绝,增进认可、理解、共识以及智慧和创意,将为"东亚三国集体结构"提供现实性基础.

Effect of Social Action and Tempering of the Collective Structure of the Three Countries in East Asia

The rapid evolution of globalization has been making an increasing and lasting impact upon East Asia. On the one hand , to become adaptable to globalization , the three countries in East Asia have enhanced their domestic policy adjustment and institutional reform for the purpose of improving their ability to deal with the super -national global system; on the other, regional cooperation at the international level in East Asia has begun in finance , trade, ecological environment, etc. How to obtain security in the global system and promote further international regional cooperation in order to make a wide and positive impact on the mechanism of international relations is a common problem that the countries in East Asia are faced with. Examined with the theory about the meaning effect of social action , Social action and social structure are two dimensions for observing the same social process , and they adhere to and construct each other. In modem society , the subject is "subject of meaning" , and social action is "action of meaning". In the process of meaning effect of action taken by society's subject , the related model system of meaning action, namely, structure of action is developed , "the heteromorphism" and "dissimilar views" in the structure may build up certain common understanding and uniform desire through the continuous production of the structural action resource. If the meaning resource inside the structure successfully develops a sort of progressive state , it will lay a solid foundation of a lasting , stable and vital cooperation. Just in this sense , we may conclude that "collective structure of the three countries in East Asia" is a fact process tempered or constructed by the action meaning effect process of China, Japan and Korea as the subject of action. In East Asia , the age of one leading country has passed. With the development of the shared understanding among China, Japan and Korea , the process of decentralization and the pursuit of subjects'equality will still go further, providing a realistic possibility for "collective structure of the three countries in East Asia" and increasing recognition , understanding , common ideas , wisdom and originality , by means of concession or adherence , and acceptance or rejection.