| 论约翰·塞尔的“是-应当”推导 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 郭立东.论约翰·塞尔的“是-应当”推导[J].四川大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(5). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 郭立东 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 四川大学,公共管理学院,四川,成都,610064 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 四川大学2007年度青年基金 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 回顾了对约翰·塞尔的"是-应当"推导的有关批评,以及塞尔对这些批评的回应和对他的理论的发展.在此基础上,借助于对行为的概念分析,试图论证,塞尔在他的推导中,混淆了做出某种行为和某种行为获得成功之间的区分;由此,未能正确地解释制度与制度性事实的关联方式,以至于认为制度性事实的存在可以否定"是-应当"区分.
|
| 关 键 词： | 构成性规则 制度性事实 是与应当 行为 承诺 |
On John Searle's 'Is ought' Derivation |
| |
| GUO Lidong.On John Searle''s ''Is ought'' Derivation[J].Journal of Sichuan University(Social Science Edition),2009(5). |
| |
| Authors: | GUO Lidong |
| |
| Institution: | Department of Philosophy;Sichuan University;Chengdu 610064;China |
| |
| Abstract: | This article intends to examine John Searle's 'is ought' derivation.We have reviewed some criticisms to this derivation,and Searle's reply to these criticisms and development of his theory.Then,by means of conceptual analysis of action,we try to argue,in his derivation,Searle overlooked the distinction between doing something and succeeding in doing something.Therefore,he didn't explain how institutes relate to institutional facts correctly,and thought that the existence of institutional facts could deny th... |
| |
| Keywords: | Constitutive Rule Institutional Fact Is and Ought Action Promise |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
