首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

英美法上的要物合同机制及其启示
引用本文:蒋军洲.英美法上的要物合同机制及其启示[J].河南工业大学学报(社会科学版),2010,6(2):76-78,152.
作者姓名:蒋军洲
作者单位:河南工业大学法学院,河南,郑州,450001
基金项目:河南工业大学高层次人才科研启动基金项目 
摘    要:关于我国民法典中要物合同的存废,英美法上的要物合同机制可带来不少启示。英美法的经验所传递的信息是,要物合同被确立下来依赖于其无偿的人际关系的产生背景,正是在此基础上,它适用"没有给就没有还"的法律逻辑。它被保留下来,很大程度上是法律传统使然。进一步分析,还可以补充上法律目的与法律伦理等方面的理由。在对待要物合同的问题上,建议以前述理由为据,保留无偿的传统要物合同,将有偿要物合同予以诺成化改造。

关 键 词:要物合同  英美法  法律逻辑  法律目的  法律伦理

THE LEGAL CONTRACTING MECHANISM OF IMPORTANT ITEMS IN THE U.S.A.& GREAT BRITAIN AND ITS INSPIRATION
JIANG Jun-zhou.THE LEGAL CONTRACTING MECHANISM OF IMPORTANT ITEMS IN THE U.S.A.& GREAT BRITAIN AND ITS INSPIRATION[J].Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition,2010,6(2):76-78,152.
Authors:JIANG Jun-zhou
Institution:JIANG Jun-zhou (School of Law,Henan University of Technology,Zhengzhou 450001,China)
Abstract:The legal contracting mechanismof important items in U.S.A.and Great Britain is a great inspiration to whether or not the contracting of important items should be abolished in China's civil code.The message conveyed by their legal experience is that the establishing of important item contracts depends on the background against the emerging of their gratuitous interpersonal relationships,which fits the legal logic of no-giving,no-returning.The mechanism survives largely because of their legal tradition and their legal objectives and moral principles as well.The paper believes that the traditional gratuitous important item contracts are to be reserved and paid important item contracts must be reformed.
Keywords:important item contract  American and British code  legal logic  legal objective  moral principle
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号