首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

钟嵘、刘勰的王粲、刘桢论辨异
引用本文:周薇. 钟嵘、刘勰的王粲、刘桢论辨异[J]. 太原理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2003, 21(3): 63-66
作者姓名:周薇
作者单位:华东师范大学,中文系,上海,200062
摘    要:在王粲与刘桢的位次上 ,钟嵘视刘桢于王粲之上 ,刘勰正相反。他们的观点与评论直接影响到后人的王粲、刘桢之论。文章细析钟嵘、刘勰在文体论与重要审美范畴上的认识差别 ,阐明二人在王粲、刘桢位次上的不同观点的缘由

关 键 词:五言  风骨  文采    
文章编号:1009-5837(2003)03-0063-04
修稿时间:2003-03-14

An Analysis of the Argument on Wang Can and Liu Zhen by Zhong Rong and Liu Xie
ZHOU Wei. An Analysis of the Argument on Wang Can and Liu Zhen by Zhong Rong and Liu Xie[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Sciences Edition), 2003, 21(3): 63-66
Authors:ZHOU Wei
Abstract:Zhong Rong considered that Liu Zhen was precedent overWang Can while Liu Xie'view was just the opposite.Their views and comments have inserted a great influence on the discussion of this subject by people of later generations. The author analyzes deeply the differences between Zhong Rong and Liu Xie's understanding of the literary style and the aesthetic judgement, and clarifies the reasons why they hold different views on the precedence.
Keywords:five words  vigor of style  elegance of style and writing  vigor  sentiment  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号