IMD-WEF国际竞争力评价比较研究——以中国为例

从IMD和WEF对中国国际竞争力评价存在很大差异的事实出发，基于两机构基本理论与方法，以及评价结果数据的比较研究，得到了以下基本结论：IMD和WEF对竞争力概念的不同认识，是产生差异的理论背景；其相应的竞争力模型、指标体系、综合信息处理方法设计，是评价结果产生差异的决定因素；就中国而言，决定差异的因素集中体现在与GDP相关的指标、对外收入指标及就业人口规模等指标数据的影响。

Comparison Study of IMD and WEF World Competitiveness Appraisal——Example for China's World Competitiveness

Based on the fact of the large difference in lIVID and WEF evalutation to mainland of China＇s world competitiveness, the paper compared of the appraisal methodology of lIVID and WEF world oompetitiveness, and found some inclusions that resulted in the large difference of evalutation. First, the difference of evalutation were based on the difference recognition about the conception of competitiveness. Second, the essential factors that resulted in the difference of evalutation were models of competitiveness, indicator systems, and integration data methods. It was reference for understanding the information about China＇s world competitiveness, and developing competitiveness research for China.