首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

《倪焕之》接受的四个视野
引用本文:陈思广. 《倪焕之》接受的四个视野[J]. 辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2012, 40(3): 127-133
作者姓名:陈思广
作者单位:四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川成都,610064
基金项目:教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目
摘    要:1929—2009年长篇小说《倪焕之》的接受成果主要体现在以下四个视野:扛鼎之作、教育—革命小说、小资产阶级知识分子和现代人状态。由于接受的标尺不一,"扛鼎之作"仅成为文本时代性的一个表称尴尬地存在于《倪焕之》的接受视域中,是否具有这一特性至今悬而未决;"教育小说"则多着眼于文本所展示的教育内涵,不免偏离文学的审美轨道";革命小说"又将文本的审美意涵维系在革命的意义上且过于理念与主观;"教育—革命小说"时过境迁视野不再。顾彬的"现代人状态"视野将小说放入20世纪世界现代化的语境中,从现代性的视域审视中国人在现代观念的冲击下产生的现代人状态,使《倪焕之》获得了全新的解读,为《倪焕之》的接受打开了新疆域。

关 键 词:倪焕之  扛鼎之作  教育—革命小说  小资产阶级知识分子  现代人状态

The Four Perspectives of the Acceptance of Ni Huan-zhi
CHEN Si-guang. The Four Perspectives of the Acceptance of Ni Huan-zhi[J]. Jounal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2012, 40(3): 127-133
Authors:CHEN Si-guang
Affiliation:CHEN Si-guang(College of Literature and Journalism,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610064,China)
Abstract:The acceptance achievements of Ni Huan-zhi in 1929-2009 are mainly from the following four perspectives: classic works;education-revolution novel;petty-bourgeois intellectuals and modern human living status.Due to various criteria of acceptance,there is still an unsettled dispute as to whether Ni Huan-zhi is a classic works or not.The perspective of "Education novel" focuses on the education content of the text,unavoidably deviating from the path of literature appreciation."Revolution novel" is too conceptive,subjective because aesthetic implication was equaled to the revolution meaning.As a result,"Education-revolution novels" is much too outdated now.Gu Bin’s perspective of modern human living status,placed the novel in 20th century’s international modernization context,gave Ni Huan-zhi a new interpretation and opened the new acceptance territory of Ni Huan-zhi.
Keywords:Ni Huan-zhi  classic works  education-revolution novel  petty-bourgeois intellectuals  modern human living status
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号