首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

国家政策之思考——基于民法第6条与台湾民法第1条的比较
引用本文:林承铎,张瑞莲.国家政策之思考——基于民法第6条与台湾民法第1条的比较[J].华北电力大学学报(社会科学版),2014(4):74-77.
作者姓名:林承铎  张瑞莲
作者单位:中国人民大学国际学院,北京100872
摘    要:我国民法通则第6条规定"国家政策"作为民法的渊源之一,但是对国家政策的概念没有明确界定,其制定主体、适用范围、与民事法律之间的关系都存在模糊性,国家政策在民事法律领域发挥重要的作用,因此完善国家政策具有必要性。台湾民法第1条与我国民法第6条规定有相似之处,但是存在一定的区别。我国民事法律没有明确规定习惯、法理作为民法的渊源,这具有特殊性,但是符合我国国情。习惯、法理作为民法的渊源,存在一定的问题,需要进行详细论证。

关 键 词:国家政策  渊源  习惯  法理

On the National Policy Thinking-based on the Sixth Article of Civil Law Compare with First Article of Taiwan Civil Law
LIN Cheng to,ZHANG Rui-lian.On the National Policy Thinking-based on the Sixth Article of Civil Law Compare with First Article of Taiwan Civil Law[J].Journal of North China Electric Power University(Social Sciences),2014(4):74-77.
Authors:LIN Cheng to  ZHANG Rui-lian
Institution:(International School of Renmin University, Beijing 100872, China)
Abstract:General principles of civil law stipulates that the sixth "national policy" as one of the source of the civil law, but the concept of the national policy is not clearly defined. Its subject, scope and application are mistiness; national policies play an important role in the field of civil law to improve national policy is a necessity. The first article of Taiwan civil law and the sixth article of our national civil law are similar, but there are some differences. Our
Keywords:national policy  source  traditional custom  legal Jurisprudence
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号