| 从说白看明本元杂剧的可靠性问题--以《单刀会》为中心 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 钱伟.从说白看明本元杂剧的可靠性问题--以《单刀会》为中心[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2006(1):30-37. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 钱伟 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 复旦大学,中国古代文学研究中心,上海,200433 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 说白简略甚至没有说白的元刊本,与说白丰富的明本到底哪一个更接近于元杂剧的原貌?本文通过对《单刀会》元刊本与明本的比较分析,证明明本所多出的说白不可能是元剧所原有而被元刊本删落的部分,而是后来窜入的;以明本———尤其是其中的说白———作为了解元杂剧的依据是不可靠的。
|
| 关 键 词： | 元杂剧 元刊本 明本 可靠性 |
| 文章编号： | 0257-0289(2006)01-0030-008 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年10月5日 |
On the Reliability of Yuan za ju's Editions of Ming Dynasty: A Case Study of Dan dao hui |
| |
| QIAN Wei.On the Reliability of Yuan za ju's Editions of Ming Dynasty: A Case Study of Dan dao hui[J].Fudan Journal(Social Sciences Edition),2006(1):30-37. |
| |
| Authors: | QIAN Wei |
| |
| Abstract: | What kind of test is closer to the original Yuan za ju,the editions of Yuan Dynasty with very few or without dialogue,or those of Ming that full of dialogues? Making a thorough analysis of the differences between Dan dao hui's edition of Yuan and the one of Ming,This paper proves that most dialogues(shuobai) in the Ming editions must come out of later hands.They are impossible the parts of the original Yuan za ju,which are considered to have been truncated in the editions of Yuan.The dialogues in the editions of Ming should not be a reliable source for the research on Yuan za ju. |
| |
| Keywords: | Yuan za ju editions of Yuan editions of Ming reliability |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
