《方言笺疏》校勘评议

本文从校勘方法、校勘中存在的问题和对后世的启示等方面，对清钱绎、钱侗《方言筹疏》的校勘作了评议。文章认为，在校勘方法中，钱氏依据字形、字音、文义，对汉扬雄《方言》的各种传本及后代研究《方言》的著作进行了校理。钱氏在校理过程中，指出了古往的一些特点和古人行文的一些体例，并阐释了一些古代文化词语。但钱氏的校理有时主观武断，有时漏掉了前人的一些精彩之说。尽管如此，钱氏的工作对我们今天研究《方言》及训估学均有一定价值。

Comment on Collation of Fang Yan Jian Shu

The thesis makes an elaborate and comprehensive collation on Fang Yan Jian Shu by Qian Yi and Qian Tong of the Qing Dynasty from its collating methods, defects in collation and inspirations to the Iater periods. In the collationg methods, Qian had collated various editions of Fang Yan by Yang Xiong of the Han Dynasty and various works on the study of Fang Yan by later authors thereof. Qian pointed out some features of ancient annotates and systems of ancient wirtings, as well as intepreted some ancient culture words. But there are some subjective assertions and neglects of penetrating opinions of the previous collators in his collation. However, Qian's works could help study Fang Yan and the history of interpretation.