人与自然的和谐何以可能--比较视野下的马克思和怀特海

马克思和怀特海关于人与自然之间的和谐理论各有侧重：马克思集中探讨社会历史哲学，并立足于人类实践活动来统领人与自然的和谐；怀特海更多地关注自然哲学，通过诉之于审美与价值取向来展开人与自然的和谐对话。但无论是马克思还是怀特海，二者都为人与自然观确立了和谐的价值旨趣，同样地也指出了生态文明建设所需要努力达到的目标：恢复有着美的秩序之宇宙和谐，并最后达到人与自然的关系、人与人的关系以及人与其自身关系之和谐，这为当今人类应对生态问题，构建起人与自然关系的全新思维范式提供了有益的启示。

How the Harmony Between Man and Nature Is Possible:Compare the Views of Marx and Whitehead

There are different emphases on harmony between man and nature by Marx and Whitehead:Marx focused on exploring the social and historical philosophy based on the practical activities of human for guiding the harmony of the nature and human; while Whitehead paid more attentions to natural philosophy to develop the harmonious dialogue between human and nature by resorting to the aesthetic and value orientation. Nevertheless, either Marx or Whitehead, both established harmonious value purport on the relationship between human and nature. Similarly, they also pointed out the goal of ecological civilization:to restore the universe harmony with the order of beauty, and finally to achieve the goal of the relationships between human and nature, individual and individual, individual human and himself being harmonized, which provides the beneficial enlightenment for the human-being coping with ecological problems and building up the new thinking paradigm of the relationship between human and nature.