论“法”的指代范围

概念是人们对反映对象的抽象，如果“反映对象”是不同的，则人们抽象出的概念的本质特征也就会截然不同；因此，要科学定义“法”这一概念，首先必须准确界定其所指代的事物范围。然而由于将马克思主义教条化，一些学者混淆种概念与属概念、整体与部分的关系，将“法律”与“法”相等同，以致我国法学界长期以来都未能科学界定“法”的指代范围。事实上，无论是从现实的语言习惯上看，还是从辨证唯物主义的相关原理上分析，“法”都应是一个包括原始社会习惯法、阶级社会的法律、未来共产主义社会的“共同规则”在内的属概念，而“法律”只能是“法”的表现形式之一，是阶级社会的“法”。

Reference Scope of "Right"

Concept is the abstraction of the reflected concepts abstracted. Therefore, the reference scope In China, however, due to the dogmatic study of Ma the concept of ＂right＂ and the reference scope of object. If the reflected objects are different, so will the of ＂right＂ needs to be classified to define it scientifically. rxism, the concept of ＂law＂ have long been equated with ＂right＂ have not been specified scientifically. In fact, whether from semantic meaning or from the relative theory of dialectical materialism, ＂right＂ should be a concept containing customary laws of the primitive society, laws of class societies and common rules of future communist society. Conversely, ＂law＂, the ＂right＂ in class society, is only one of the manifestations of ＂right＂.