首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

民事抗诉理论的争议与评述
引用本文:李荣辉,古丽夏蒂.民事抗诉理论的争议与评述[J].新疆大学学报(社会科学版),2007,35(3):62-65.
作者姓名:李荣辉  古丽夏蒂
作者单位:新疆警官高等专科学校法律系 新疆乌鲁木齐830011
摘    要:民事抗诉学说中废除说、限制说、加强说是不全面的,完善说符合我国国情和法制建设的需要。民事抗诉属公权力行为,抗诉过程充分体现当事人地位平等和诉讼平等,检察机关只发挥程序性启动再审的作用,实体判断仍由法院完成。协调民事抗诉与当事人处分权之间的关键是,涉及私人利益时应充分尊重当事人处分权;涉及社会公共利益时,则以职权主动抗诉。由于我国民事抗诉制度立法粗糙和原则抽象,迫切需要修改完善。

关 键 词:民事抗诉  争议  评述
文章编号:1000-2820(2007)03-0062-04
修稿时间:2006年12月14

On the Dispute and Commentary in Civil Protesting Theory
LI Rong-hui,Guhxiadi.On the Dispute and Commentary in Civil Protesting Theory[J].Journal of Xinjiang University,2007,35(3):62-65.
Authors:LI Rong-hui  Guhxiadi
Abstract:This paper,analyzing the four theories "abolishment theory,limitation theory,strengthening theory,and perfecting theory",holds that the protesting procedure shows fully the parties' equality in status and lawsuit.In this case,the procuratorial organs only give full play to start procedural re-trial, while the judgment is still executed by the court.In fact,the key to coordinating civil protest and the party's treatment right is to fully respect the party's treatment right when private interest is concerned and to protest voluntarily with the power vested when social public interest is concerned.China's civil protest system and legislation are imperfect abstract,which needs urgent improvement.
Keywords:Civil protest  dispute  commentary
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号