Relational Sacrifices about Intimate Behavior and Relationship Quality for Expectant Cohabitors |
| |
Authors: | Melissa A Curran Tricia J Burke Valerie J Young Casey J Totenhagen |
| |
Institution: | 1. Department of Family Studies and Human Development, Norton School of Family and Consumer Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USAmacurran@email.arizona.edu;3. Department of Communication Studies, Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas, USA;4. Department of Communication, Hanover College, Hanover, Indiana, USA;5. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA |
| |
Abstract: | ABSTRACTUsing interdependence theory, we examined how relational sacrifices specific to intimacy were associated with positive (commitment, satisfaction, love, and maintenance) and negative (ambivalence and conflict) relationship quality among expectant, unmarried cohabitors (n = 69 individuals), because this group may struggle relationally. We examined how often individuals made sacrifices for their partners and their partners’ perceived awareness of their sacrifices (i.e., individuals’ perceptions that their partners are aware that intimate sacrifices had been made for them) for both members of the couple using Actor Partner Independence Models. We controlled for children from previous relationships, unplanned pregnancy, gender, education, and race/ethnicity. Results showed that frequency of intimate sacrifices was not associated with any aspects of relationship quality. Instead, as expected, perceived partner awareness of intimate sacrifice was associated with greater commitment, satisfaction, love, and maintenance for individuals; lower ambivalence for individuals; and lower conflict for both individuals and their partners. These results suggest that for expectant cohabitors, perceived partner awareness of intimate sacrifices is central to achieving more positive, and less negative, relationship quality. |
| |
Keywords: | APIM cohabitors intimacy relational sacrifices relationship quality |
|
|