| 先秦儒道美学思想中的“和谐”观比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 耿爱先.先秦儒道美学思想中的“和谐”观比较[J].佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版),2004,22(6):23-26. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 耿爱先 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 佛山科学技术学院,社会科学教学部,广东,佛山,528000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 先秦儒道两家都视和谐为天地自然之根本,但在和谐的本源问题和解决这个问题的目的、方式上则有所不同.概括来讲一个主张"天行有常",一个坚持认为应"道法自然";一个强调"和而不同",一个坚持"知和曰常".
|
| 关 键 词： | 天行有常 道法自然 和而不同 知和曰常 致中和 吾丧我 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-018X(2004)06-0023-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年5月13日 |
A Comparison of Views on Harmony in the Aesthetic Thought of Confucianism and Taoism in the Pre-Qin Dynasty |
| |
| GENG Ai-xian.A Comparison of Views on Harmony in the Aesthetic Thought of Confucianism and Taoism in the Pre-Qin Dynasty[J].Journal of Foshan University(Social Science),2004,22(6):23-26. |
| |
| Authors: | GENG Ai-xian |
| |
| Abstract: | The Confucianism and Taoism in the Pre-Qin dynasty both regarded Harmorry as the foundation of nature, but held different views on the purpose and means in dealing with the origin of harmony. Generally speaking, the former advocated "the nature has its law", the later stood for "the law regulates the nature",the former emphasized on "harmonious but not united", the latter insisted on "understanding and harmony is eternality". |
| |
| Keywords: | the nature has its law the law regulates the nature harmonious but not united understanding and harmony is eternality |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
