| 后哲学话语中的哲学合法性质疑——以德勒兹为例 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 程党根.后哲学话语中的哲学合法性质疑——以德勒兹为例[J].南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,37(4):17-22. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 程党根 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南昌大学,人文学院,哲学系,江西,南昌,330047 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2002年国家社科基金项目“当代法国哲学的三大主题”(项目编号:02CZX006) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 西方哲学自诞生以来,无论是在古代、近现代时期,还是在后现代时期,一直在为自己进行“合法性”论证。后现代哲学对此前哲学的突破,就在于它质疑了后者的以“同一说”、“树喻说”和“独断思想形象”为要素的“三位一体”的“合法性”基础,并在“哲学就是概念的创造”的旗号下,以“差异说”、“块茎说”和“游牧思想”为基础的“三位一体”重塑了后现代哲学的合法性基础。
|
| 关 键 词： | 后哲学 合法性 德勒兹 |
| 文章编号： | 1006-0448(2006)04-0017-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006年6月6日 |
Questioning on the Philosophical Legitimacy in the Post-philosophical Discourses: An Example on Deleuze |
| |
| CHENG Dang-gen.Questioning on the Philosophical Legitimacy in the Post-philosophical Discourses: An Example on Deleuze[J].Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences),2006,37(4):17-22. |
| |
| Authors: | CHENG Dang-gen |
| |
| Abstract: | Western philosophy has always demonstrated "legitimacy" for itself during its ancient,modern and post-modern times since it came into being.A breakthrough of the post-modern philosophy to its predecessors is that it has oppugned the basis of "legitimacy" of traditional philosophy composed of the "trinity" of "identical theory","the doctrine of arboreal metaphor" and "dogmatic image of thoughts",and has re-shaped the basis of "legitimacy" of the post-modern philosophy by the "trinity" of "theory of difference","doctrine of rhizome" and "nomadic thoughts" with the banner that "philosophy is creating concepts". |
| |
| Keywords: | post-philosophy legitimacy Deleuze |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
