首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

一个虚假而有意义的问题--对"中国哲学学科合法性问题"的解读
引用本文:俞吾金.一个虚假而有意义的问题--对"中国哲学学科合法性问题"的解读[J].复旦学报(社会科学版),2004(3):27-34.
作者姓名:俞吾金
作者单位:复旦大学,当代国外马克思主义研究中心,上海,200433
摘    要:中国哲学学科的合法性问题是近年来哲学界讨论的热点.本文认为,当人们以西方哲学作为参照系,从哲学应该具有什么样的内容的角度来探讨中国哲学学科的合法性时,这个问题乃是一个假问题,因为在不同的文明中,都存在着一个宗教、艺术和科学所无法取代的领域,只要这个领域存在,研究这个领域的学科也就获得了自己的合法性.至于人们用什么样的名称去指谓它,乃是一个与合法性无涉的问题.当人们不是从中国哲学应有的内容,而是从其作为一门学科所应有的形式出发去讨论合法性问题时,这一问题才真正地获得自己的意义.

关 键 词:合法性  能指游戏  无人之域  假问题  意义
文章编号:0257-0289(2004)03-027-00
修稿时间:2004年3月1日

A False But Meaningful Issue An Interpretation of the legitimacy of Chinese Philosophy As A Discipline
Yu Wu-jin.A False But Meaningful Issue An Interpretation of the legitimacy of Chinese Philosophy As A Discipline[J].Fudan Journal(Social Sciences Edition),2004(3):27-34.
Authors:Yu Wu-jin
Abstract:The legitimacy of Chinese philosophy as a discipline has been a hot issue discussion in the philosophical circles in recent years. According to this author,as people investigate this issue from the perspective of what content philosophy ought to have by referring to the western philosophy,it is,in fact,a false issue,because there is a realm in different kinds of civilization which religion,art and sciences can never substitute. If only there exists this field,the corresponding discipline with this realm as its research object gets its own legitimacy. As for how people would name it,it is an issue not related to legitimacy. Only when people consider this issue of legitimacy of Chinese philosophy in terms of its form as a discipline rather than in terms of its content,will it really get its own meaning.
Keywords:legitimacy  game of signifier  field without person  false problem  meaning  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号