| 优势效应句法和语义制约 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张杰.优势效应句法和语义制约[J].上海理工大学学报(社会科学版),2015,37(1):14-20. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张杰 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 安庆师范学院 外国语学院, 安庆 246113 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 教育部人文社科研究规划基金资助项目(10YJA740126);安徽省社科规划项目(AHSKF07-08D44);英语国家级特色专业项目(TS12154) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 句法上,vP与VP之间存在一个带有及物性特征、EPP和赋格能力的TrP。Tr的介入不仅将MLC可以解释的优势效应wh问句推导出来,而且对"等距离说"和"宾语一致短语"模式无法解释的优势效应消失的问句也能推导出来。语义上,英语非D-连接wh问句缺乏单项对子解读、D-连接wh短语定指意义和wh主目语具备选择性功能对wh优势效应的产生及其接受程度构成制约。
|
| 关 键 词： | 优势效应 优势效应消失 句法推导 语义制约 |
| 收稿时间： | 2013/11/4 0:00:00 |
Syntactic and Semantic Constraints of Superiority Effects |
| |
| Zhang Jie.Syntactic and Semantic Constraints of Superiority Effects[J].Journal of University of Shanghai For Science and Technilogy(Social Science),2015,37(1):14-20. |
| |
| Authors: | Zhang Jie |
| |
| Institution: | School of Foreign Languages, Anqing Teachers College, Anqing 246113, China |
| |
| Abstract: | Syntactically,TrP,which is a case-marking head phrase with a transitivity feature and EPP,exists between vP and VP.The presence of Tr is able to derive not only wh-questions in which superiority effects arise which MLC can explain,but also questions in which superiority effects disappear which the equidistance and AgrOP models cannot explain.Semantically,English non-D-linked wh-questions' inadequacy of SP readings,D-linked wh-words' specificity and wh-arguments' choice functions all constrain the appearance of superiority effects and their acceptability. |
| |
| Keywords: | superiority effects disappearance of superiority effects syntactic derivations semantic constraints |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《上海理工大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《上海理工大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文 |
