首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

大数据侦查在司法活动中的应用与制度构建
引用本文:陈纯柱,黎盛夏.大数据侦查在司法活动中的应用与制度构建[J].重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版),2018,30(1):29-36.
作者姓名:陈纯柱  黎盛夏
作者单位:重庆邮电大学网络空间安全与信息法学院,重庆,400065
基金项目:国家社会科学基金项目:“网络问题”的制度化研究(11BZZ062);重庆邮电大学社会科学重点项目:网络空间法律治理的若干问题研究(K2015-174);重庆市社会科学十九大专项招标项目:习近平新时代“网络安全战略”研究(2017023)
摘    要:大数据侦查对传统侦查模式而言是一次革命性的变革.大数据侦查对司法活动中数据的发现、提取、追踪、储存、研判和应用,开辟了侦查模式的新纪元.文章从多个方面系统地研究了大数据侦查在司法活动中的应用问题,即全面研究了大数据侦查在司法活动中的特征与价值,大数据侦查在司法活动中存在的困境,包括公权力与个人信息权的博弈在法律上很难认定、大数据预测在因果推理中带来的困惑、大数据分析结论在证据形式中的法律地位问题、大数据侦查的预测性在司法实践中可能会违背无罪推定原则、传统侦查思维模式的阻挠和缺乏复合型司法侦查人才等问题.同时,对大数据侦查在司法活动中的制度构建问题进行了研究,明确了大数据侦查在司法活动中的制度构建原则问题以及完善大数据侦查在司法活动中的制度构建措施等.

关 键 词:大数据侦查  特征与价值  应用中的问题  制度构建
收稿时间:2017/9/25 0:00:00
修稿时间:2017/12/12 0:00:00

Research on the Application of Big Data Investigation in Judicial Activities and Institution Construction
CHEN Chunzhu and LI Shengxia.Research on the Application of Big Data Investigation in Judicial Activities and Institution Construction[J].Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications:Social Science Edition,2018,30(1):29-36.
Authors:CHEN Chunzhu and LI Shengxia
Institution:School of Cyber Security and Information Law, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Chongqing 400065, China and School of Cyber Security and Information Law, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications,Chongqing 400065, China
Abstract:Big data investigation is a revolutionary transformation compared with the traditional investigation mode. Big data investigation opens a new era for investigation mode with the discovery, extraction, track, storage, study and determination as well as application of the data in judicial activities. This paper systematically studies the application of big data investigation in judicial activities from many perspectives and fully studies the characteristics and value of big data investigation and the dilemmas of it in judicial activities, including the difficulty of identifying public power and personal information right in law, the confusion brought by big data prediction in causal reasoning, the legal status of big data analysis conclusion as evidence, the possibility that the predictable big data investigation may violate the doctrine of presumption of innocence, the obstruction of traditional investigation mode, the lack of sophisticated judicial investigative personnel and other problems. Meanwhile, the institution construction of big data investigation in judicial activities is studied. The principles of institution construction of big data investigation in judicial activities and its improvement measures are clarified.
Keywords:big data investigation  characteristics and value  problems in application  institution construction
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号