《家语》的“层累”形成考论——阜阳双古堆一号木牍所见章题与今本《家语》之比较

通过比较阜阳双古堆一号木牍相关章题与《孔子家语》,可以发现:《家语》存在很多后人改动的痕迹,而《说苑》则与木牍章题最为接近。很多材料可以证明,从出土文献到《说苑》再到《家语》,存在梯次演进的痕迹,而《家语》处于最末一级,因此在版本学上是“晚出”的。但《家语》的改动并非出于王肃之手,而很可能就是孔安国所为。《家语》由于脱胎于“诸子百家语”之类的“说”类材料,因此在材料来源上体现出“多元化”的特点,故而很多内容并非孔子及其弟子的言论实录。

A Research on the "Accumulatively" Shaping of Jiayu——The Comparisons between the Chapter Titles on the No 1 Wooden Tablets of Fuyang Shuanggudui and Jiayu

By comparing the chapter titles on the wooden tablets of Fuyang Shuanggudui with Confucius Jiayu,we can find that there are many signs of changing by someone afterwards,while Shuoyuan is very close to the chapter titles.Many materials fully prove that there lived a gradually evolving trail from the excavating literatures to Shuoyuan and down to Jiayu.In this trail,Jiayu obviously lied just at the terminal,so it is late on edition.But,we think the above changes had made maybe just by Kong Anguo,not Wang Su.Jiayu has a different source of materials,as it emerged from the "Shuo" materials like "Zhuzi Baijiayu",so'its content sometimes are no the true record of speech by Confucius and his students.