Poverty and placement outcomes of Intensive Family Preservation Services

It is argued that Intensive Family Preservation Services (IFPS) often fail to prevent the out-of-home placement of children because family poverty impedes long-term effectiveness of the interventions. Current research is examined to demonstrate that families with lower socioeconomic status have higher rates of substitute care placement and that many IFPS families do not have the minimum income commonly assumed necessary to facilitate successful therapeutic interventions. Research also shows that poverty contributes to child abuse and neglect, to mental health problems, and to juvenile delinquency, resulting in a disproportionate representation of poor children in the three child systems. Until family poverty is significantly reduced, IFPS will continue to have disappointing results for a sizeable portion of their clientele.