首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

逻辑研究:本质的反思与理论的风险
引用本文:廖德明.逻辑研究:本质的反思与理论的风险[J].太原师范学院学报(社会科学版),2009,8(3):29-31.
作者姓名:廖德明
作者单位:西华师范大学,文学院,四川,南充,637002
摘    要:古代逻辑源于对辩论传统中真实论证的研究,但是之后数个世纪,这门学科变得高度抽象化,高度理论化。高度抽象化、理论化的背后潜伏着某种风险:距离普通人越来越远;与数学的界限越来越模糊;学科界定的错位。逻辑研究将何去何从?逻辑的目的是如何使我们有效地思维,从而作出对与错的判定,逻辑研究也应该回归到这一普遍的意义上来,唯有如此,逻辑才能走入大众,逻辑的力量才能得到彰显。

关 键 词:逻辑  思维  生活

Research on Logic:Thinking to the Nature and Theoretical Risks
LIAO De-ming.Research on Logic:Thinking to the Nature and Theoretical Risks[J].Journal of Taiyuan Normal University:Social Science Edition,2009,8(3):29-31.
Authors:LIAO De-ming
Institution:China West Normal University;Nanchong 637002;China
Abstract:Logic arose in Antiquity from the study of the real argumentation in the tradition of debate. Over the centuries that followed, the discipline turned highly abstract and profoundly theoretical, behind which there are some risks: more and more distant from ordinary people, the blurred boundary from mathematics and subject as defined in the wrong. Where is logic going, and should it? The purpose of logic is how to make us thinking in effective ways so that right or wrong can be determined. The study of logic should also return to this universal significance, only by this logic can be publicly accepted, and the power of logic can be revealed.
Keywords:logic  thinking  life  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号