网购收货地侵权管辖地之理论证成

对于知识产权侵权类案件中的商品收货地是否具备管辖权这一问题,有观点认为网购商品收货地为合同履行地,也有观点认为是侵权行为地。上述观点是对民诉法司法解释第20条中的“信息网络方式”以及民事诉讼法第28条中的“侵权行为地”存在不当理解。如果认为网购收货地法院具备管辖权,则会与《民事诉讼法》中“两便原则”之立法精神相抵牾,同时也没有充分考虑到网络销售环境中知识产权侵权的特点。应当明确网络销售收货地并非网络环境下侵犯知识产权案件的管辖连接点。同时参考比较法上的做法,通过“最低程度联系”原则以及滑动标尺法Zippo交互性测量分析的方法,来判断被诉网站是否具有交互性特点,从而确定适合的管辖地。除此之外,立法和司法实践中也可以通过确定保护性管辖原则以及强化当事双方签订管辖协议等做法,来促进对该问题的化解。

Theoretical Demonstration of the Place of Infringement Jurisdiction in the Place of Online Shopping

Regarding the determination of IPR infringement jurisdiction in online sales, the main problems in practice are:the improper understanding of the "information network approach" in Article 20 of the judicial interpretation of the Civil Procedure Law, and the "infringement" in Article 28 of the Civil Procedure Law."Behavioural ground" is improperly understood, and it is not analogous to the conclusion in the "Interpretation of Computer Network Copyright Disputes". This approach not only violates the existing legislative purpose of the Civil Litigation Law, but also fully considers the characteristics of IP sales infringement on the Internet. Therefore, it should be clarified that the place of receipt of goods on the Internet is not the jurisdiction of the use of Internet infringement of intellectual property rights. For this purpose, the problem can be improved by determining the principle of protective jurisdiction and drawing on the rules of long arm jurisdiction.