首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

重构我国民事诉讼证明标准
引用本文:汪颜芬.重构我国民事诉讼证明标准[J].集美大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,7(1):29-33.
作者姓名:汪颜芬
作者单位:集美大学,社科系,福建,厦门,361021
摘    要:证明标准是证据法中重要而又难以把握的问题。认为我国民事案件应该采用法律真实的证明标准而不是客观真实的证明标准。而法律真实证明标准又可分为优势证据证明标准和高度盖然性证明标准。根据人们认识事物常态和现阶段的法律状况等因素,认为我国民事案件应该采用高度盖然性证明标准,在采用高度盖然性证明标准过程中有些事项需要予以注意。

关 键 词:证明标准  客观真实  法律真实  优势证据证明标准  高度盖然性证明标准
文章编号:1008-889X(2004)01-29-05
修稿时间:2003年9月4日

Rebuild Standard of Persuasion in Civil Action
WANG Yan-fen.Rebuild Standard of Persuasion in Civil Action[J].Journal of Jimei University (Philosophy and Social Sciences),2004,7(1):29-33.
Authors:WANG Yan-fen
Abstract:Standard of proof is an important issue in evidence law; however, it is difficult to grasp accurately. The author thinks we should adopt legal truth but objective truth in selecting standard of persuasion in civil action. Standard of providing legal truth can be classified into witness standard of preponderance of probability and the high degree of probability. The author considers witness standard of the high degree of probability should be adopted in our civil cases according to the usual way of knowing things, the present state of law and other factors. We should pay attention to something in course of applying witness standard of the high degree of probability.
Keywords:standard of proof  objective truth  legal truth  preponderance of probability  high degree of probability  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号