翁方纲“肌理”说研究现状思考

向来关注翁方纲的学者，都绕不开他的“肌理”说。通过梳理二十世纪以来对“肌理”说的专门研究，发现自郭绍虞先生将“肌理”定义为义理与文理，并将其他概念都整合在二者之下，后来的研究者都没有脱离这个思维定式，因此，整个“肌理”说研究，一方面出现简单概括的现象，另一方面由于无法完美解释翁方纲诗学的其他概念，又在阐释其他问题时忽视了“肌理”概念的形成时间，导致出现错综的情况。近来研究者对“二元论”的苑囿有所突破，但对“肌理”说内涵和地位的认识仍不足，而翁方纲诗学在清代诗学史上的地位，也没有得到最终的确立。

Status Quo of o Weng Fanggang's “Jili” Theory Studies: A Reflection

Scholars interested in Weng Fanggang seldom ignore Reviewing the studies of his theory since 20th Century, we find his ＂ Jili＂ （texture） theory. that all later scholars follow Guo Shaoyu＇s definition of ＂Jili＂ as ＂Yili＂ （logical relationship） and ＂Wenli＂ （textual coherence） . As a result, studies of ＂Jili＂ on one hand become simplistic, and on the other hand unable to explain the Weang Fanggang＇s other poetic concepts. The negligence of historical background of Weng＇s invention of the theory leads to more complex situation. Though in recent years there have been some breakthroughs against the ＂dual-element＂ theory, there still lack adequate understanding of the connotation and position of ＂texture＂ theory. As a result, Weng＇s position in the poetic history of Qing Dynasty has yet been ultimately established.