| "忠孝不能两全"之哲学辨析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 朱凤祥."忠孝不能两全"之哲学辨析[J].郑州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,36(5):136-139. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 朱凤祥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 商丘师范学院,历史系,河南,商丘,476000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 忠孝之道是中国传统政治文化的主干。忠和孝都要求自觉地服从和维护权威,所以理论形态上的忠孝之道具有相通之处。在封建社会里,为了专制统治的需要,统治阶级极力倡导“忠孝一体”。但因忠、孝所服务的对象不同,在实践中,忠和孝会不可避免地发生冲突,造成忠孝不能两全。
|
| 关 键 词： | 忠 孝 君臣 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-8204(2003)05-0136-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003年2月7日 |
Philosophic Analysis of"Being Loyal to the Country and Being a Dutiful Son Cannot Exist at Once" |
| |
| ZHU Feng-xiang.Philosophic Analysis of"Being Loyal to the Country and Being a Dutiful Son Cannot Exist at Once"[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition),2003,36(5):136-139. |
| |
| Authors: | ZHU Feng-xiang |
| |
| Abstract: | The way of'being loyal to the country and being a dutiful son' is the main part of the traditional politic culture of China. Both the two want man to conscientiously obey and defend the authority, so in theoretical formation they are interlinked. In feudalist society, in order to meet the want of autocracy rule, the ruling class specially advocated 'combining being loyal to the country and being a dutiful son into one body'. But owing to the objects they served were different, in reality it was unavoidable for the two to conflict and resulted in that they could not be carried out at once. |
| |
| Keywords: | Being loyal being a dutiful son the lord and the minister |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
