首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

《四库全书总目》明代史评提要述论
引用本文:李程. 《四库全书总目》明代史评提要述论[J]. 华中师范大学研究生学报, 2010, 0(1)
作者姓名:李程
作者单位:华中师范大学文学院;
摘    要:本文基于对《四库全书总目提要》明代史评提要阅读的基础上展开述论。《四库全书总目提要》为中国古典目录学集大成之作。其史部设史评类,著录历代史评著述。明代史评收入正目仅有2部,而列入存目却多达61部。《提要》对明代史评的评论,既有对明代学风之批驳,又有对于明代学者史学素养之褒贬。《提要》对史评经典《史通》极为推崇,在对明代《史通》研究的批评中表达了对于明代史学研究的认识。对明代史评著述的评论中,反映着《提要》之史学观念与评论方法。

关 键 词:《四库全书总目》  明代史评  《史通》  

The Study of the Historical Criticism of Ming Dynasty in The Catalogue of Complete Collection of the Four Treasuries
LI Cheng. The Study of the Historical Criticism of Ming Dynasty in The Catalogue of Complete Collection of the Four Treasuries[J]. Huazhong Normal University Journal of Postgraduates, 2010, 0(1)
Authors:LI Cheng
Affiliation:LI Cheng(Humanities School,Huazhong Normal University,Wuhan 430079,China)
Abstract:This paper is based on The Catalogue of Complete Collection of the Four Treasuries.And this book is the classic of Chinese ancient bibliography.The Part of History criticizes the history and many essays of history comments before.Only two Ming historical comments are in records while the other sixty-one are all in save.The comments of Ming focused on the learning style in Ming Dynasty and scholars' quality during that period.The Synopsis held the study of history in high esteem,and it presents the understan...
Keywords:The Catalogue of Complete Collection of the Four Treasuries  the Historical Criticism of Ming Dynasty  the study of history  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号