| 刑事证据标准与证明标准之异同 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 熊晓彪. 证据标准的具象维度与实践纠偏——兼论类案证据标准的数据化统一[J]. 北京航空航天大学学报社会科学版, 2022, 35(4): 38-49. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0009 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 熊晓彪 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中山大学 法学院, 广东 广州 510275 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家社会科学基金重大项目(18ZDA139) |
| |
| 摘 要： | 中国司法实践将证据标准混同于证明标准、充分性标准等事实认定的判准，不但使其偏离了本来意涵与功能，而且导致了
|
| 关 键 词： | 证据标准 具象维度 实践纠偏 数据化统一 技术缺陷 |
| 收稿时间： | 2022-01-04 |
Concrete Dimensions of Evidence Standard and Correction of Misunderstandings in Practice: On the Data-based Unification of Evidence Standard in Similar Cases |
| |
| XIONG Xiaobiao. Concrete Dimensions of Evidence Standard and Correction of Misunderstandings in Practice: On the Data-based Unification of Evidence Standard in Similar Cases[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Social Sciences Edition, 2022, 35(4): 38-49. DOI: 10.13766/j.bhsk.1008-2204.2022.0009 |
| |
| Authors: | XIONG Xiaobiao |
| |
| Affiliation: | School of Law, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou Guangdong 510275, China |
| |
| Abstract: | In Chinese judicial practice, evidence standard is confused with proof standard, adequency standard and other standards of fact-finding, which not only deviates from the original meaning and function of Chinese justicial practice, but also leads to the problems like |
| |
| Keywords: | evidence standard concrete dimension correction of misunderstandings in practice data-based unification technical defect |
|
| 点击此处可从《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版)》下载全文 |
