首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

对德奥弗拉斯特在逻辑史上的贡献的再认识
引用本文:孙培福.对德奥弗拉斯特在逻辑史上的贡献的再认识[J].山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版),2004,49(3):125-128.
作者姓名:孙培福
作者单位:山东政法管理干部学院,基础部,山东,济南,250014
摘    要:德奥弗拉斯特跳出亚里士多德直言三段论又为人类逻辑贡献了假言、选言三段论,其创造性学说一直被错误地视为命题逻辑。德奥弗拉斯特本意在于开拓新逻辑关系,挖掘新研究对象,并非在意变项为何形式。后人臆测其变项为命题,从而归为命题逻辑,这是以分析方法混淆了研究对象。斯多葛命题逻辑并未发展德奥弗拉斯特学说,直到现代数理逻辑都是走了另一条路。正确认识德奥弗拉斯特的贡献,才能明辨普通逻辑的方向。

关 键 词:德奥弗拉斯特  变项  研究对象  分析方法
文章编号:1001-5973(2004)03-0125-04
修稿时间:2004年1月15日

Further Cognition of Theophrastus' Contribution In the History Of Logic
Sun Peifu.Further Cognition of Theophrastus'''' Contribution In the History Of Logic[J].Journal of Shandong Teachers' University(Social Science Edition),2004,49(3):125-128.
Authors:Sun Peifu
Abstract:Theophrastus, departing from Aristotle's categorical syllogism, has contributed hypothetical and selective syllogism to the logic of mankind. Yet his creative theory has always been wrongly regarded as propositional logic. For his real intention lies in carving out a new logical relation and tapping the new objects of study, instead of caring about what form the variable is. Later scholars have surmised that the variable is proposition, thus classifying it as propositional logic. This has actually confused the objects of study with the means of analysis. From propositional logic of Stoicism that has failed to develop Theophrastus' theory, and even the present mathematical logic has gone astray. Consequently, only by having a correct understanding of Theophrastus' contributions, can we be able to clearly distinguish the direction of general logic.
Keywords:Theophrastus  variable  objects of study  means of analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号