| 论苏轼与程颐在道论和性情论上的差别 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孔涛. 论苏轼与程颐在道论和性情论上的差别[J]. 齐鲁学刊, 2008, 0(6) |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孔涛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 山东大学,历史文化学院,山东,济南,250100 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 苏轼在道论上以"道"为体,以"易"为用,在性情论上以"性"为体,以"情"为用;程颐在道论上以"道(理气合一)"为体,以"中"为用,在性情论上则以"性"为体,以"中"为用。苏轼的"中"始终是一价值实体;而程颐的"中"则从价值实体上升为存在本体和人性本体。
|
| 关 键 词： | 苏轼 程颐 道论 性情论 体用关系 |
The Differences between Sushi and Chengyi in Taosim and Humanism |
| |
| Kong Tao. The Differences between Sushi and Chengyi in Taosim and Humanism[J]. Qilu Journal, 2008, 0(6) |
| |
| Authors: | Kong Tao |
| |
| Abstract: | Sushi's ontology and his theory of phenomenon is based on "Tao" and"Changes" respectively,in accordance,his thoughts on human nature and emotion is based on "xing" and "qing".In contrast,Chengyi's "Tao" is quite different in content from sushi's,his theory of phenomenon is restructured with"mean" in both Taoism and humanism,and the conception of "mean" conveys different meaning in Sushi and Chengyi's ideology. |
| |
| Keywords: | Sushi Chengyi Taoism humanity noumenon-phenomenon |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
