首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

许霆案之法学反思
引用本文:王志亮.许霆案之法学反思[J].湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版),2012,17(1):66-71.
作者姓名:王志亮
作者单位:上海政法学院 刑事司法系
摘    要:“许霆案”是一个由民事行为转化为犯罪行为的典型案件,根据我国现行《刑法》的规定,比之于法院判决“盗窃罪”的定性,其定性为“侵占罪”更为合适。“许霆案”的启示是,刑法既不能冤枉一个无辜者,也不能放纵一个犯罪人;而且,应罪刑相适,罪轻则刑轻,罪重则刑重。这是现代社会刑法理念下普通公民、立法者、司法者应该追求的法律公正。

关 键 词:许霆案  盗窃罪  侵占罪  不当得利  无因管理
收稿时间:8/2/2011 12:00:00 AM

Reflection on Law Case of Xu Ting
WANG Zhiliang.Reflection on Law Case of Xu Ting[J].Journal of Hunan University of Technology(Social Science Edition),2012,17(1):66-71.
Authors:WANG Zhiliang
Institution:Department of Criminal Justice, Shanghai University of Political Science and Law
Abstract:According to the rules of current "Penal Pode",Xu Ting case,compared with curt ruling "thieves offencs",is a typical criminal case that has been resulted form the civil case and is more suitable when it is regarded as embezzlement crime.The apocalypse getting from "Tu Ting case" is that penal code can not wrong an innocent people as well as indulge a crime personp;And,penal should go with in response to the offense,such as:offense is light when penal is light,offense is heavy when the penal weigh.These should be under the modern social penal code principle by the common citizen,lawgiver andjudicatory who are going to pursuing law candor.
Keywords:Xu Ting case  crime of theft offense  crimes of embezzlement  unjustified enrichment  no reason manages
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《湖南工业大学学报(社会科学版)》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号